Thursday, October 6, 2016

The Invisible is only Visible to the Invisible: Circle Blog #4

To be completely honest, the shark in the fish tank portion of The Circle was beyond creepy.  This menacing, mysterious, monster invades the habitat of all the other sea creatures and generates massive amounts of panic as it consumes every living thing in sight.  The other ocean life, most originating from the Mariana Trench, are no match for the nightmarish fish and seek shelter in the container they are held in before being fed to the shark.  The entire scene, as viewed by Mae's transparency cameras, represents an overgeneralized version of the Circle and its impacts on individuals in society through connections to privacy, greed, and total annihilation.

The Circle kills privacy.  Perhaps not on purpose, the Circle views privacy as a dark place secrets can hide and eat away at society.  This idea is exemplified by the victim sea creatures' apparent clinging to their tub habitat before being fed into the tank (Eggers 320).  In their perspective, the privacy is all that is left to protect them from the jaws of death.  Similarly, in society during the novel, the privacy of the individual is being sacrificed as people begin to put all of their information online and visible to everyone.  There is no more metaphorical "tub" to protect people from one another.

The Circle is just as much a greedy monster as the shark in the tank.  Stopping at nothing, the three wise men have the vision to "complete the circle" and to finally get everything connected and online under one platform.  In this way, the shark in the tank begins to replicate the actions of the Circle through is ravenous hunger.  One obstacle at a time is consumed and disposed of and the hunger is still not satisfied.  The problem with the Circle is that, with their amount of wealth and influence, an infinite amount of social "improvements" can be found.  The shark has a relatively supreme sense of power in the tank and cannot be stopped, just like the company.


In addition to being extremely greedy, the sea monster in the tank also showcases the idea of total annihilation.  Even though the Circle supports the idea that nothing should be able to be deleted anymore, they indirectly delete any real-life interactions from being genuine. Everything the Circle attacks has been destroyed or dismantled and then displayed for the world.  For example, when Mae breaks the law, they utilize their transparent cameras to showcase to everyone how they can correct an individual's wrongs.  The shark in the tank also shows the world its ability to do the same by being slightly translucent and allowing viewers to see its digestive track process its food while it defecates ash (Eggers318).

In the end, the shark in the fish tank is mostly a forced metaphor set up by Eggers that represents the idea of the circle.  In my opinion, the relationship between the monster and the innocent fish around it it is too close to the interaction between the Circle and society. Although it creates a clear similarity between the two, the shark appears asa random symbol created to establish the metaphor.  Regardless, the shark form the Mariana Trench is an accurate representation of the Circle in that it invades the privacy of other living things, it knows no limits, and it totally destroys anything without leaving a recognizable trace behind. Hopefully, Mae can realize this negative trend in society and move to action.

Image Credits:
Image provided by Klaus Stiefel 

8 comments:

  1. I worked off of the same idea. But your analysis about privacy is much smarter than mine. I didn't think about the animals in the tank valuing privacy. And I also agree with you that Eggers forced the comparison.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I worked off of the same idea. But your analysis about privacy is much smarter than mine. I didn't think about the animals in the tank valuing privacy. And I also agree with you that Eggers forced the comparison.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow, your post was great!From just reading your title I was drawn in. You did a nice job comparing the shark in tank to the society at the circle. I would've never though of the shark in the fish tank to be a metopher. All in all you had alot of details and support to back your claim. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  4. That shark was pretty creepy. I like how you showed that the Circle was eating away at people's privacy, like the shark eats everything in its path. I also like how you showed that even though the Circle doesn't want to delete anything, they still are. I really found your post very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! I'm glad you found it interesting. I really wanted to draw attention to the fact that the shark was an clear metaphor for the Circle and that nothing could hide from it.

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The title is great and very captive. The idea comparing the shark to the circle is very smart when reading I did not make that comparison. I also thought how you used terms like "jaws of death" to go with the subject of the post was very creative

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I try to utilize word choice to connect back to the same message, and I'm glad you noticed that! And the title wrote itself! Only those with complete vision can see that which is invisible itself, but that can make them more visible to everyone else.

      Delete